Add an option to GCC easyblock to export LIBRARY_PATH#3713
Closed
ocaisa wants to merge 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
Closed
Add an option to GCC easyblock to export LIBRARY_PATH#3713ocaisa wants to merge 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
LIBRARY_PATH#3713ocaisa wants to merge 1 commit intoeasybuilders:developfrom
Conversation
Member
Author
|
This is not a correct fix and has actually been already addressed in #3584 (see https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks/blob/develop/easybuild/easyblocks/g/gcc.py#L206-L212) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It's come up in EESSI that setting this can be useful when using the GCC compiler directly, see https://www.eessi.io/docs/using_eessi/building_on_eessi/#manually-building-software-on-top-of-eessi-without-easybuild
Basically with this change, instead of having to do
to get a working executable, you would just need
which requires less explaining.